Articles

Often in stats research, teams encounter the imperative for comparing groups/samples’ central tendencies. While ANOVA frequently helps, it requires normalcy and homogeneity. When extremes or non-normality mar data, non-parametric exams better interpret. One such is Mood’s median test, which bears its discoverer’s name.

Designed by comparing medians of independent sets, it proves beneficial for exploratory or skewed information interpreters. Mood’s median examines central data proclivities without distorted normal prerequisites.

Particularly valued amid non-normalcy or outliers plaguing parametric test suppositions, it remains sturdy against aberrations.

By flagging central fixtures reliably notwithstanding abnormalities, Mood’s median grasps realities obscured to others. For teams grappling information information-defying widespread methods, it enlightens the next moves without parametric bonds.

Its sturdiness aids comprehension through hindrances to standard stats’ works, steering steady problem-solving as demands evolve. Joined insight lifts enterprises serving communities enduringly.

Key Highlights

• Mood’s median test gauges medians between independent sets or samples non-parametrically. It proves an alternative when normalcy and homogeneity fail one-way ANOVA demands.
• Stemming from chi-squared distributions, it examines normally distributed, equal medians hypotheses crosswise multitudes. Unperturbed by outliers or skews, suitability expands to non-regular figures.
• Allowing bi-sample or multi-sample examination, suppositions include detachment, continued or ordered information alongside near underlying designing forms.
• Furnishing test analytics and p-values, researchers determine if discernments distinguish significantly. Applicable where aberrations undermine orthodox techniques, it champions comprehension through unforeseen hurdles materializing.
• By flagging median divergences reliably regardless of incongruences, Mood’s median guides choice-making, and optimization cooperatively sailed.

What is Mood’s Median Test?

Mood’s median test compares groups/samples’ midpoints non-parametrically unlike parametric exams demanding specific distributions.

Not requiring normalized information lets it interpret where those prerequisites limit. It expands bi-sample median investigations to abundance.

Null proposes population-wide medians align against another differing, tested against multi-treatment, independent demographic, or non-regular set median divergences.

Keys involve:

• Examining multiple test subject brackets
• Assessing treatment effects on non-standardized figures
• Analyzing where regular assumptions constrain

While ANOVA outpaces spotting central tendency changes on normalized information, Mood’s median soundly detects divergences without such presumptions.

Proposed in ‘54 by Alexander Mood, it approximates chi-squared as repeats enlarge, providing valid conclusions minus distribution stipulations. For teams grappling with non-parametric realities, it highlights and provides choices.

Assumptions of Mood’s Median Test

Before running it, it’s important to check that the assumptions of the test are met. Violating these assumptions can lead to invalid results and conclusions. The key assumptions are:

1. Random Samples: The data must be collected using random sampling from the respective populations. This ensures the representativeness of the samples.
2. Independent Observations: The observations within each sample should be independent of each other. There should be no relationship between the observations that could influence the values.
3. Continuous or Ordinal Data: It requires the data to be continuous (measured on an interval or ratio scale) or ordinal (ranked data).
4. Similar Shape Distributions: While it does not require the distributions to be normal, the distributions should have similar shapes and spread. Dissimilar shapes can affect the validity of the results.
5. No Outliers: Extreme outliers in the data can significantly influence the median values and distort the test results. It’s recommended to check for and handle any outliers before conducting the test.
6. Tied Values: It can handle tied values (observations with the same value) within the samples. However, an excessive number of ties can reduce the test’s power and sensitivity.

Checking these assumptions is crucial as violations can increase the risk of Type I (false positive) or Type II (false negative) errors. Various graphical and statistical methods, such as histograms, boxplots, and normality tests, can be used to assess the assumptions.

If assumptions are violated, appropriate data transformations or non-parametric alternatives may be considered.

Hypothesis Testing in Mood’s Median Test

The Mood’s median test is a non-parametric hypothesis test that allows you to determine if the medians of two or more groups differ. It tests the null hypothesis that the medians of the groups are equal, against the alternative that at least one population median is different.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the medians of all groups are equal. Mathematically, this can be represented as:

H0: Median1 = Median2 = … = Mediank

Where k is the number of groups being compared.

Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that at least one median is different from the others. There are three possible alternative hypotheses:

1) Two-tailed test: At least one median differs

Ha: Not all medians are equal

2) Upper-tailed test: At least one median is larger  

Ha: At least one median is larger than the others

3) Lower-tailed test: At least one median is smaller

Ha: At least one median is smaller than the others

The choice between one-tailed or two-tailed depends on the research question.

Test Statistic

Mood’s median test uses a chi-square test statistic to evaluate the null hypothesis. The test statistic follows a chi-square distribution with k-1 degrees of freedom when the null is true.

The test statistic is calculated from the number of observations above and below the grand median in each group. Larger deviations from the expected counts indicate greater evidence against the null hypothesis of equal medians.

P-Value

The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as the one calculated, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A small p-value (typically <0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null, allowing you to reject it.

Interpretation

If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level (e.g. 0.05), you reject the null hypothesis. This means at least one group median is statistically different from the others. Effect sizes and confidence intervals help quantify the median differences.

The test makes no assumptions about the distribution shapes, making it a robust non-parametric alternative to the one-way ANOVA when data violates normality assumptions.

Performing Mood’s Median Test

To perform it, there are several steps to follow. First, you need to state the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the medians of the groups are equal, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that at least one median is different.

Next, you’ll need to combine all the data points across groups and find the overall median. This combined median serves as the test criterion. 

For each group, count how many data points are greater than, less than, or equal to the combined median. These counts form the frequencies needed to calculate the test statistic.

It follows a chi-square distribution with k-1 degrees of freedom, where k is the number of groups. Calculate this test statistic based on the frequency counts and degrees of freedom.

Compare the test statistic to the critical value from the chi-square distribution for your chosen alpha level (e.g. 0.05). If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, you fail to reject it.

Calculating the test statistic can be tedious by hand for larger sample sizes. Most statistical software like R, Python, Minitab, etc. have built-in functions to run Mood’s median test and provide the p-value directly. The p-value approach is equivalent – if p < alpha, reject H0.

It’s good practice to report the test statistic value, degrees of freedom, p-value, sample sizes, and your conclusion about the null hypothesis. Effect sizes can also provide more insight into the practical significance beyond statistical significance.

Mood’s Median Test in Statistical Software

It can be performed using various statistical software packages. While the test calculations can be done manually, using software is much more efficient, especially for larger datasets. Here are some examples of how to implement it in popular statistical programs:

Mood’s Median Test in R

In R, the mood.test() function from the RVAideMemoire package allows you to perform Mood’s median test. Here is an example:

“`r

install.packages(“RVAideMemoire”)

library(RVAideMemoire)

# Example data 

x1 <- c(42, 37, 39, 44, 36, 38)

x2 <- c(40, 39, 38, 37, 31, 43)

# Perform Mood’s test

mood.test(x1, x2)

“`

This will output the test statistic, p-value, and other relevant metrics for Mood’s median test on the two sample vectors x1 and x2.

Mood’s Median Test in Python

For Python, the scipy.stats module provides the median_test() function to conduct the test. Here’s an example:

“`python

from scipy import stats

# Example data

x1 = [42, 37, 39, 44, 36, 38] 

x2 = [40, 39, 38, 37, 31, 43]

# Perform Mood’s test

stats.median_test(x1, x2)

“`

The median_test() function returns the chi-square statistic and p-value for the test.

Mood’s Median Test in Excel

Excel does not have a built-in function for this test. However, you can use add-ins or write custom VBA code to perform the test.

The Real Statistics Resource Pack provides a Mood’s Median Test data analysis tool for Excel.

Mood’s Median Test in SPSS, SAS, Minitab

Most major statistical software like SPSS, SAS, and Minitab provide the functionality to run this test, albeit through different function names and syntax. Refer to the respective documentation for implementation details.

No matter which software you use, be sure to verify the assumptions of this test before interpreting the results. Additionally, report the test statistic, p-value, sample sizes, and any other relevant metrics when presenting your findings.

Comparing Mood’s Median Test

When choosing a statistical test, it’s important to understand how Mood’s median test compares to other commonly used non-parametric tests like the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Mood’s Median Test vs Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

Both Mood’s median test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test are non-parametric alternatives to the two-sample t-test. However, the Wilcoxon test assumes that the distributions have the same shape, while Mood’s test does not require this assumption.

Mood’s test is preferred when you cannot make the equal distribution shape assumption.

Mood’s Median Test vs Kruskal-Wallis Test

The Kruskal-Wallis test is a non-parametric alternative to one-way ANOVA for comparing more than two independent groups.

Like the Wilcoxon test, it assumes the distributions have the same shape. This test can be used when this assumption is violated, making it more robust for certain data sets.

Mood’s Median Test vs ANOVA

The key difference is that ANOVA is a parametric test that requires assumptions like normality and homogeneity of variances. The test is a non-parametric alternative when these assumptions are not met. It tests for differences in medians rather than means.

While sacrificing some statistical power compared to parametric tests when assumptions are met, this test is a robust option for non-normal data or heterogeneous variances across groups. The choice depends on whether the parametric assumptions can be reasonably satisfied.

Post-Hoc Analysis

If Mood’s median test detects a statistically significant difference among groups, post-hoc tests may be needed to determine which specific groups differ. Options include pairwise Mood’s median tests with a multiplicity adjustment.

Additional Considerations

While this is a useful non-parametric alternative to the one-way ANOVA, there are some additional points to keep in mind:

Power and Sample Size

Like other statistical tests, the power of Mood’s median test to detect an effect depends on the sample size.

With small samples, the test may not have enough power to find a significant difference even if one exists. Researchers should perform power analysis ahead of data collection to ensure adequate sample sizes.

Ties

Mood’s median test can handle tied observations within groups. However, it cannot deal with ties across different groups of medians. If there are ties across medians, the test may not be valid and an alternative like the Kruskal-Wallis test should be used instead.

Post-Hoc Analysis

If the overall test is significant, indicating differences between some of the medians, post-hoc tests are needed to determine which specific pairs of groups differ. Common post-hoc approaches include the Mann-Whitney U test or Dunn’s test.

Assumption Violations

While Mood’s test has fewer assumptions than the one-way ANOVA, the assumptions of random sampling and independence of observations still apply. Violations can increase the chance of false positives or false negatives.

Effect Size

Like other hypothesis tests, a significant p-value does not convey the degree of difference between groups. Effect sizes like the probability of superiority should be calculated and interpreted along with the p-value.

Reporting

When reporting the results, good practice involves stating the test statistic value, degrees of freedom, p-value, sample sizes, medians, and effect size estimate. Graphical displays like boxplots can also aid interpretation.

Overall, Mood’s median test is a robust non-parametric tool. Still, careful checking of assumptions, appropriate sample sizing, post-hoc testing if needed, and comprehensive reporting of results is recommended for valid inference.