Articles

Technique that helps multiple scrum teams coordinate and deliver complex projects effectively is called as Scrum of Scrums (SoS).

By establishing a structured communication framework that maintains agility while scaling up operations this method bridges the gap between individual Scrum teams

Scrum of Scrums has grown into an essential tool for organizations managing large-scale agile implementations. This was developed by Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber in 1996.

Key Highlihgts

1. Setting up effective SoS meetings and structures
2. Selecting the right team representatives
3. Managing cross-team dependencies efficiently
4. Scaling SoS for enterprise needs

The Purpose and Value of Scrum of Scrums

The purpose of Scrum of Scrums extends beyond simple team coordination. This scaling framework enables organizations to maintain agile principles while managing complex projects across multiple teams.

The main goal focuses on creating seamless integration between different Scrum teams working toward shared objectives.

Teams using Scrum of Scrums can identify and resolve cross-team dependencies early in the development cycle.

This proactive approach prevents bottlenecks and ensures smooth project progression.

The framework also facilitates knowledge sharing between teams, reducing duplicate work and promoting innovative solutions to shared challenges.

Benefits for Growing Organizations

Large organizations implementing Scrum of Scrums see significant improvements in project delivery and team coordination.

The framework creates clear communication channels between teams, making it easier to track progress and address obstacles quickly.

This improved visibility helps leadership teams make informed decisions about resource allocation and project priorities.

The Scrum of Scrums structure also supports better risk management.

When multiple teams coordinate regularly, they can identify potential issues before they become major problems.

This early detection system helps organizations maintain project momentum while managing complex dependencies between teams.

Daily Scrum vs. Scrum of Scrums: Key Differences

While both meetings focus on coordination, daily Scrums and Scrum of Scrums serve different purposes.

Daily Scrums concentrate on individual team progress and immediate obstacles. Team members discuss their daily tasks and coordinate within their small group.

The Scrum of Scrums, however, addresses broader organizational concerns. Representatives from each team meet less frequently, typically two to three times per week. These meetings focus on:

• Cross-team dependencies and integration points
• Shared resources and their allocation
• Technical decisions affecting multiple teams
• Progress toward common release goals

The scope of discussion in Scrum of Scrums meetings extends beyond daily tasks to include strategic alignment and long-term planning.

This wider perspective helps organizations maintain coherence across multiple teams while preserving the agility of individual Scrum units.

Organizations often customize the frequency and format of Scrum of Scrums meetings based on their specific needs.

Some teams might meet more frequently during critical project phases, while others maintain a regular schedule throughout the development cycle.

The purpose of Scrum of Scrums becomes particularly valuable when organizations scale their agile practices.

By providing a structured approach to cross-team coordination, this framework helps maintain efficiency and effectiveness as projects grow in size and complexity.

Implementing Scrum of Scrums Effectively

The success of Scrum of Scrums meetings depends heavily on having the right participants.

Each Scrum team typically sends one or two representatives to these meetings.

The most effective representatives often include the Scrum Master and a technical team member who can address specific implementation questions.

Product Owners may join these meetings when discussions involve product strategy or feature dependencies.

Their presence becomes particularly valuable during release planning or when addressing customer-facing issues that affect multiple teams.

Key Roles and Their Responsibilities

The Scrum of Scrums meeting requires clear role definition for optimal effectiveness.

The Chief Scrum Master or designated meeting facilitator guides discussions and ensures meetings stay focused on cross-team coordination.

This role maintains the meeting’s rhythm and helps teams address impediments efficiently.

Team representatives must actively participate by sharing relevant updates and identifying potential blockers.

They serve as communication bridges, bringing important information back to their respective teams while escalating critical issues to the broader group.

Meeting Frequency That Drives Results

Most organizations conduct Scrum of Scrums meetings two to three times per week.

This frequency strikes a balance between maintaining alignment and avoiding meeting fatigue. Teams might adjust this schedule based on project phases or organizational needs.

During critical release periods or when tackling complex integration challenges, daily Scrum of Scrums meetings might become necessary.

The key lies in maintaining enough frequency to address cross-team dependencies without overwhelming participants with excessive meetings.

Structured Agenda for Maximum Impact

The scrum of scrums agenda follows a structured format to ensure productive discussions.

A typical 30-minute meeting includes:

First 15 minutes:

• Team representatives share completed work affecting other teams
• Discussion of upcoming work that might impact others
• Identification of current impediments or blockers

Final 15 minutes:

• Problem-solving for identified impediments
• Resource allocation discussions
• Agreement on action items and next steps

Teams should stick to this timeboxed format to maintain efficiency

The scrum of scrums meeting agenda should remain focused on cross-team coordination rather than detailed technical discussions, which can be handled in separate forums.

The implementation of Scrum of Scrums requires ongoing refinement based on team feedback and organizational needs.

Regular retrospectives help teams adjust their approach and improve the effectiveness of these coordination meetings over time.

Scaling Scrum of Scrums for Larger Organizations

When organizations grow beyond 10-12 Scrum teams, the basic Scrum of Scrums model requires additional scaling.

The Scrum of Scrum of Scrums (SoSoS) emerges as the next logical step, creating a hierarchical structure that maintains efficient communication across hundreds of team members.

This scaled model introduces a new layer of coordination where representatives from each Scrum of Scrums meet regularly.

The structure preserves the essential elements of the original format while expanding its reach to accommodate larger organizational needs.

Each level maintains its own backlog and coordinates dependencies specific to its scope.

Integration with SAFe and Other Frameworks

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) incorporates Scrum of Scrums as a crucial element in its implementation.

In the SAFe context, Scrum of Scrums operates within the Agile Release Train (ART), facilitating coordination between teams working on shared objectives.

This integration enables organizations to maintain agile practices while scaling their operations effectively.

SAFe Scrum of Scrums meetings focus on program-level coordination, ensuring alignment with portfolio objectives and release plans.

The framework provides additional structure through roles like the Release Train Engineer (RTE), who helps coordinate multiple Scrum of Scrums within the organization.

Organizational Structure Adaptations

Different organizational structures require unique adaptations of the Scrum of Scrums model.

Matrix organizations might implement cross-functional Scrum of Scrums meetings that align with both product and technical streams.

This approach ensures proper coordination across different organizational dimensions while maintaining clear lines of communication.

Geographic distribution adds another layer of complexity to scaling Scrum of Scrums.

Organizations with teams across multiple time zones often implement asynchronous communication methods to supplement their regular meetings.

Implementation Strategies for Success

Successful scaling of Scrum of Scrums requires careful attention to several key factors:

First, organizations must establish clear escalation paths for issues that cannot be resolved within a single Scrum of Scrums group.

Second, they need to maintain consistent meeting cadences across all levels of the hierarchy.

Third, they should implement standardized reporting mechanisms that facilitate quick decision-making without creating excessive overhead.

The safe agile Scrum of Scrums implementation often includes additional roles and ceremonies that support larger-scale coordination.

These additions help manage dependencies and ensure alignment across the organization while preserving the agility of individual teams.

Organizations must regularly evaluate and adjust their scaling approach based on feedback and changing needs.

This flexibility ensures that the Scrum of Scrums structure continues to serve its primary purpose of enabling effective coordination and delivery at scale.

Common Challenges and Solutions in Scrum of Scrums

Coordination challenges often emerge when implementing Scrum of Scrums in agile environments.

Teams frequently struggle with unclear communication channels and misaligned priorities.

The solution lies in establishing standardized reporting mechanisms and creating clear escalation paths for cross-team issues.

Regular synchronization between team representatives helps prevent information silos.

Maintaining Meeting Focus and Efficiency

Many organizations struggle to keep Scrum of Scrums meetings focused and productive.

Discussions often drift into technical details or single-team concerns, diluting the meeting’s effectiveness.

Setting strict time-boxes for each agenda item and maintaining a clear scope for discussions helps teams stay on track.

Meeting facilitators should guide conversations back to cross-team coordination when they stray.

Using visual boards or digital tools to track discussion points and action items helps maintain meeting structure and ensures important topics receive proper attention.

Balancing Team Independence with Organizational Goals

The tension between team autonomy and organizational alignment presents a significant challenge in Scrum of Scrums implementation.

Teams need independence to work effectively, yet must coordinate their efforts toward common objectives.

Regular alignment sessions help teams understand how their work contributes to broader organizational goals without sacrificing their autonomy.

Managing Resistance to New Processes

Resistance to change often surfaces when introducing Scrum of Scrums into existing agile frameworks.

Teams might view additional meetings as unnecessary overhead or feel threatened by increased transparency.

Addressing this resistance requires demonstrating clear value through early wins and measurable improvements in cross-team coordination.

Organizations should provide adequate training and support during the transition period.

Gradually introducing new practices and adjusting them based on team feedback helps build buy-in and ensures sustainable adoption of the Scrum of Scrums framework.

Practical Solutions for Long-Term Success

Success in Scrum of Scrums depends on finding practical solutions to these common challenges.

Organizations must establish clear metrics to measure the effectiveness of their coordination efforts.

Regular retrospectives focused specifically on Scrum of Scrums help teams identify and address emerging issues before they become significant problems.

Creating feedback loops between different levels of the organization ensures that the Scrum of Scrums structure remains effective as teams grow and evolve.

This ongoing refinement process helps organizations maintain agility while scaling their operations.

Common Challenges in Scrum of Scrums (SoS) Implementation and Corresponding Solutions

Challenge	Solution	Specific Actions	Expected Outcomes
Lack of clear goals for the SoS	Establish clear objectives for the SoS	– Define SoS purpose in alignment with overall project goals- Communicate these objectives to all teams	– Improved focus and alignment- Better understanding of SoS value
Poor communication between teams	Foster effective cross-team communication	– Set up standardized communication protocols- Use collaboration tools (e.g., Slack, Jira, Confluence)	– Reduced misunderstandings- Efficient information sharing
Inconsistent participation	Assign dedicated representatives	– Identify and rotate skilled team members to represent their team- Ensure consistent attendance	– Better continuity- Improved team representation in SoS meetings
Overloaded agendas	Use focused agendas and time-boxing	– Prioritize critical issues- Limit meeting duration to 30–60 minutes	– More productive meetings- Reduced fatigue and wasted time
Conflicts between team priorities	Align team priorities with overall goals	– Use Product Owners or Scrum Masters to mediate- Emphasize shared objectives during planning	– Harmonized team efforts- Enhanced delivery of program-level goals
Difficulty in tracking dependencies	Implement dependency tracking tools and visual aids	– Use dependency boards or maps- Regularly update shared artifacts	– Greater visibility of dependencies- Timely resolution of inter-team blockers
Lack of authority to make decisions	Empower SoS to resolve cross-team issues	– Define decision-making protocols- Grant decision authority within predefined boundaries	– Faster resolution of impediments- Increased trust in the SoS process
Inadequate resolution of impediments	Streamline impediment escalation and resolution	– Establish a clear escalation path- Track impediments in a shared tool	– Quicker unblocking of teams- Enhanced productivity
Scaling challenges in large organizations	Use a tiered Scrum of Scrums approach	– Introduce multiple layers (e.g., SoS, SoSoS)- Clearly define roles and responsibilities for each tier	– Improved scalability- Clear structure and accountability
Cultural resistance to collaboration	Promote a collaborative culture	– Conduct workshops on Agile mindset- Recognize and reward collaboration efforts	– Increased buy-in from teams- More cooperative environment
Too much focus on technical details	Keep discussions at a program level	– Enforce agenda discipline- Defer technical discussions to specialized groups	– Reduced distraction- Focus on overall program delivery
Time zone differences in distributed teams	Optimize meeting schedules and use asynchronous updates	– Use tools like video recordings or shared dashboards- Rotate meeting times to balance inconvenience	– Increased participation- Inclusion of distributed team members

The key to overcoming these challenges lies in maintaining flexibility while adhering to core Scrum principles.

Organizations that successfully navigate these obstacles often emerge with stronger, more resilient agile practices that support their continued growth.

Comparing Scrum of Scrums with Other Scaling Methods

Learn the difference between these scaling methods and know which method is best for you.

Scrum of Scrums vs SAFe: Key Distinctions

The difference between SAFe and Scrum of Scrums becomes apparent in their scope and structure.

While Scrum of Scrums focuses primarily on team-level coordination, SAFe provides a more structured framework that addresses scaling at multiple organizational levels.

SAFe incorporates additional roles, ceremonies, and artifacts that extend beyond the basic Scrum framework.

SAFe introduces concepts like Agile Release Trains and Program Increments, creating a more rigid structure for planning and delivery.

In contrast, Scrum of Scrums maintains greater flexibility, allowing organizations to adapt the framework to their specific needs without implementing additional organizational layers.

Scrum of Scrums vs Nexus Framework

The difference between Nexus and Scrum of Scrums lies in their approach to integration and dependency management.

Nexus emphasizes product integration through specific practices and roles, including the Nexus Integration Team.

This team takes responsibility for ensuring cross-team dependencies are identified and resolved early in the development cycle.

Scrum of Scrums takes a lighter approach, focusing on communication and coordination rather than prescribing specific integration practices.

This flexibility makes Scrum of Scrums easier to implement initially, though it may require additional structure as organizations grow.

Selecting the Right Scaling Approach

Organizations must consider several factors when choosing between scaling methods. Scrum of Scrums works well for organizations that:

• Need to coordinate between 3-9 teams
• Value flexibility in their scaling approach
• Want to maintain existing team structures
• Prefer minimal additional overhead

SAFe might be more appropriate when:

• Organizations have more than 10 teams
• Need portfolio-level management
• Require standardized practices across programs
• Want prescribed roles and ceremonies

Nexus often suits organizations that:

• Focus heavily on product integration
• Have strong technical dependencies
• Need structured dependency management
• Want to maintain Scrum purity

Implementation Considerations

The success of any scaling method depends on organizational readiness and cultural alignment. Scrum of Scrums requires strong communication skills and self-organizing teams.

SAFe demands significant organizational commitment and change management. Nexus needs technical excellence and strong integration practices.

Organizations should evaluate their current capabilities, desired outcomes, and available resources before selecting a scaling approach.

Starting with Scrum of Scrums often provides a foundation for adopting more structured frameworks later if needed.

The choice between scaling methods should align with organizational goals and culture.

While each framework offers unique benefits, successful scaling depends more on proper implementation and organizational commitment than the specific method chosen.

Moving Forward with Scrum of Scrums

The implementation of Scrum of Scrums marks a significant step in scaling agile practices effectively.

This framework provides organizations with the structure needed to coordinate multiple teams while maintaining the agility that drives modern software development.

The success of Scrum of Scrums relies on clear communication channels, well-defined roles, and consistent meeting cadences that support cross-team collaboration.

Organizations that excel in implementing Scrum of Scrums recognize the importance of balancing team autonomy with organizational alignment.

They establish clear escalation paths, maintain focused meetings, and adapt their approach based on regular feedback from all participants.

These practices ensure that teams remain productive while working toward shared objectives.

The Future of Scaled Agile Coordination

As organizations continue to grow and evolve, the role of Scrum of Scrums becomes increasingly vital.

The framework’s flexibility allows it to adapt to changing business needs while maintaining its core purpose of enabling effective cross-team coordination.

Whether used independently or integrated with other scaling frameworks, Scrum of Scrums provides a foundation for sustainable organizational growth.

The success of Scrum of Scrums in modern organizations depends on several key factors.

Teams must maintain strong communication practices, embrace transparency, and remain committed to continuous improvement.

Leadership support plays a crucial role in creating an environment where these practices can flourish.

Final Considerations for Implementation

Organizations considering or currently implementing Scrum of Scrums should focus on creating value through improved coordination and faster problem resolution.

The framework’s success lies not in rigid adherence to specific practices but in its ability to facilitate effective collaboration between teams.

Regular evaluation and adjustment of Scrum of Scrums practices ensure their continued effectiveness as organizations evolve.

By maintaining focus on core principles while remaining flexible in implementation, organizations can build sustainable scaling practices that support their long-term growth objectives.

The journey of implementing Scrum of Scrums requires patience, commitment, and continuous refinement.

Organizations that invest in proper training, support their teams through the transition, and remain open to feedback create an environment where scaled agile practices can thrive.